![]() I pretty much figure that about 8-10 lbs capacity is the minimum for general use with all but the smallest dSLR (say 4/3 system). You pretty much have to go with a small head.īTW.capacities for tripods are usually vastly over stated. The problem with replacing is the size of the mounting platform on the legs (see photo). Would you fully extend the legs on a mountain ridge on a breezy day and step back for a self portrait? No way!Īs for the head being interchangeable.yes, you can mount a different unit. Slik is careful to annotate their description with a cautionary "well-balanced load".Ĭould you use the Sprint Pro with a K10D for table top shots with the legs spread on the middle setting? Yep, that would work. Whether that can be accomplished with stability is another matter. I do believe that both will support that weight without collapsing. The head for the Sprint Pro is rated at 4.5 pounds and the legs at 8 pounds. I'll mainly use primes with it, so I'll probably be around 2.2 pounds.Īlso, the head is interchangeable, so would a better head make it more useful with the K10D?I thought the same regarding the 2.2 lb camera vs. I am looking for a decent travel tripod and had more or less decided on this one! According to the specs, the head can handle up to 4.5 pounds, do you find this is not the case? While it did not work out for my daughter, I may yet buy one for myself to use with my film cameras. I sent it back in exchange for an Induro AB1 that is a more suitable solution for my daughter and her K10D with zoom. The Sprint Pro is a finely crafted jewel of a product at a fairly reasonable price. The ball head platform and base are better-suited to a super-zoom P&S, a compact 35mm SLR, or a 4/3 dSLR. Unfortunately, the Sprint Pro is not a good match for a camera as bulky as the K10D. Surprisingly, the same was true about the included head. The materials and workmanship of the legs were first rate. When I took delivery, I was pretty impressed. Just twist the handle to loosen the head, point the camera to frame your subject and twist the handle in the other way to lock the head and camera in position, simple. I will also say that I prefer the Vortex Summit SS-P to the Slik Mini II, it's a lot less flimsy feeling in my personal opinion. I prefer the Promaster legs compared to anything else on that list, and have it topped with an Outdoorsmans pistol grip head. ![]() Here is the stock photo from the THK Web site: Second, the SLIK Mini Pro V has an easy-to-use 2-way pan head with simple one handle operation for locking and unlocking the head to position the camera quickly and easily. I've also spent time with the Slik Mini II, Slik 624, Slik 634 and one of the Siriu models. The combination of light weight (1.9 lbs) and compact size (18.9" folded) at only $85 USD with included ball head sounded perfect. I saw the Slik Sprint Pro (black) and felt that it would foot the bill quite nicely. For Christmas, I wanted to get my world-traveling daughter a quality, compact tripod. ![]() Here’s a stock photo of the SLIK Sprint Mini II that shows you what it looks like right out of the box.This is the last of my tripod reviews (I promise!). As you can see, it’s still much smaller than the Gitzo. Here is a size comparison of my Gitzo Mountaineer tripod without a ballhead installed next to the SLIK Sprint Mini II with the Acratech GP-s installed. I would definitely recommend this tripod to anyone looking for a solid and lightweight tripod to carry on backpacking trips. After adding the Acratech ballhead and removing the center column, my tripod weighs in at exactly 2.2 lbs. The plastic leg locks are easy to use and I like the padding on the aluminum legs. ![]() I try not to use the fourth section of the legs if I don’t need to, as they are the smallest and most flimsy. While not super tall, this tripod is tall enough for my needs and the legs are pretty solid for the weight and size. It weighs so little that I don’t mind carrying it with me even if I don’t end up using it, which is exactly what I was looking for in a backpacking tripod. The center column comes out easily and could be installed again if it’s ever needed.Īfter bringing this tripod on a few backpacking trips, I have to say that it’s working quite well for me. The only other modification I have made is I have removed the center column to save a little weight since it is not a feature I would use with my heavy DSLR anyway. This larger and more substantial ballhead adds a little bit of weight, but it’s worth it to me. In its place I still use the Acratech GP-s that I have used on all of my other tripods, since it’s a quality piece of gear that I like to use. If I had any complaints about this tripod, it would be with the tiny ballhead, but I never had any plans to use it in the first place. Before I purchased this tripod, I made sure that the ballhead that is included with it was removable.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |